Where to start › Planning ahead › Siblings & family meetings
Siblings, family meetings, and hired referees
The care plan is usually easier than the family. This page is about the family, and it starts by correcting what we used to tell you.
About the statistics we removed
This page used to open with numbers from a 2010 industry study. It said that in 43% of families one sibling gives most or all of the care, that only 2% split it evenly, and that the main caregiver puts in about four times the hours of the others. We could not open the original report to check who was studied or how. A claim about how common something is, on a page families use to make decisions, needs better backing than that. So the numbers are gone.
Here is what needs no statistic. If the work in your family is lopsided, you are not imagining it. The way to make it something you can talk about is to stop arguing about what is fair and start writing down tasks and hours. Lodestone's free care log worksheet is a place to do that. A list is harder to argue with than a feeling.
The family meeting, the way FCA describes it
The Family Caregiver Alliance (FCA) has the best-known guide.[1] Its points, in order:
- Invite everyone who is or will be part of the caregiving team. FCA says this includes family friends, neighbors and paid caregivers, not only blood relatives.
- Someone writes an agenda. FCA suggests these topics: the doctor's report, feelings, daily care needs, money, who has the power to decide, and what support is needed.
- List all the worries before solving any of them. Families skip this step. That is why meetings turn into a fight over the first thing someone brings up.
- Make it safe to say things. FCA says all feelings are okay and need to be said and heard. People should say "I" and not "you" ("I feel…" not "you always…").
- Set a time limit. FCA says plainly that meetings that wear people out make them not want to come to the next one.
- Write a summary of what each person agreed to. Put it in writing afterward and send it to everyone. FCA says this prevents mix-ups.
- Meet on a regular basis — FCA suggests once a month — and don't treat this as one big meeting. That takes away the pressure to settle everything today. It also lets the plan change as things change.
- Relatives who live far away join by phone. And they get real jobs: bills, insurance calls, research, paying for respite. "I can't be there" and "I can't help" are two different sentences.
A social worker, mediator or care manager can lead the meeting when the family itself is the problem. FCA's advice comes from experience. It is not a tested program with a measured result. And no kind of meeting fixes a family that will not come to the table.
Should the older person be in the room?
This page used to say to include the parent whenever you can, period. FCA's advice is more careful, and more useful. Family members should not generally be left out. But if the person has dementia, or might not understand what the meeting is for, you may want to hold the first meeting without them and then hold a separate meeting with them there.[1]
The thing to remember is that a diagnosis is not a reason to plan around someone. What they want still shapes the result. The separate talk is how you find out what they want.
When to hire the referee
An Aging Life Care professional, also called a geriatric care manager, works with clients and families through "consultation, assessment, care coordination and advocacy." In plain words: they give advice, size up what is needed, line up care, and speak up for the person. Their association says they look at the whole person, for older adults and others with ongoing health problems. It says they come from many kinds of schooling and jobs, with a special focus on aging and disability.[2] The National Institute on Aging describes the same job as making a care plan and finding the services you need.[3]
For families who live far away, this person is eyes on the ground. For a family that is stuck, it is a neutral voice from a professional. Several families tell us that is the real value. That is what they say, not something a study found.
On money: this page used to give $100–$200 an hour and $300–$600 for a first assessment, and said Medicare does not cover it. The association's site does not give fees or say who pays, and we found no other source we could check. So those numbers are gone. Ask directly, before the first meeting: what is your training, what is your hourly fee, is there a minimum charge, what does a first assessment cost, and does any insurance or program pay for this? In most states anyone can use the title. That is why you should ask about training and not just accept the label.
Find one: aginglifecare.org.
The guilt, briefly
Needing a care facility is not a broken promise. The promise was that your person would be cared for. It was not that every hour of the care would come from your own body. And a decision made together holds up better than one carried alone. That is most of what the meeting is for.
Free local help. Your Area Agency on Aging will talk through your choices with you for free. Find yours through the federal Eldercare Locator at 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov (run by the Administration for Community Living).[4] To learn about the four kinds of local helpers and what each one does, see Who helps me locally.
Quick answers
How do families divide elder care between siblings?
Unevenly, in most families. But we took out the statistics this page used to give. They came from a 2010 industry study that we could not open to check who was studied or how. A claim about how common something is needs better backing than that. Here is what helps with no statistic at all. Write a list of the tasks and the hours. An argument about whether the split is fair goes nowhere until everyone is looking at the same list. Then give the sibling who lives far away real jobs: bills, insurance calls, research, paying for respite.
How do you run a family meeting about aging parents?
The Family Caregiver Alliance (FCA) advises this. Include everyone who is or will be part of the caregiving team. That can mean friends, neighbors and paid caregivers. Have someone write an agenda that covers the doctor's report, feelings, daily care needs, money, who has the power to decide, and what support is needed. List all the worries before anyone starts solving them. Say "I" and not "you" ("I feel…" not "you always…"). Set a time limit so people do not leave worn out. Write a summary of what each person agreed to. And meet on a regular basis, once a month if you can, not just once. Relatives who live far away can join by phone. [1]
Should the older person be in the meeting?
FCA's answer is more careful than "always," which is what this page used to say. It says family members should not generally be left out. But if the person has dementia, or might not understand what the meeting is for, you may want to hold the first meeting without them and then hold a separate meeting with them there. What they want should still shape the result. A diagnosis is not a reason to plan around someone. [1]
Sources and what they support
Sources checked 2026-09-19 using AI-assisted editorial research. This is a source check, not professional advice.
- Family Caregiver Alliance, holding a family meeting. Supports every element of the meeting guidance here: inviting everyone who is or will be part of the caregiving team including friends, neighbours and paid caregivers; preparing an agenda covering the physician's report, emotional concerns, daily care needs, finances, decision-making authority and support needs; listing concerns before problem-solving; the framing that all feelings need to be expressed and acknowledged and the use of "I" statements; setting time limits to avoid fatigue and resistance to future meetings; a written summary of what each person agreed to; meeting regularly, ideally monthly; remote participation; and the nuanced advice about holding an initial meeting without a person who has dementia or might misunderstand its purpose, followed by a separate meeting with them present. This is practice guidance from a caregiver organisation. It does not establish a tested effect on family conflict or on care outcomes.
- Aging Life Care Association. Supports the quoted description of Aging Life Care as a holistic, client-centred approach and the quoted list of what these professionals do — consultation, assessment, care coordination and advocacy — and that practitioners come from varied educational and professional backgrounds with a specialised focus on aging and disability. The association's site does not state fees, minimums or whether any payer covers the service, so this page gives no prices. It is the profession's own membership body, so a listing is not an independent assessment of an individual practitioner.
- National Institute on Aging, aging in place: growing older at home. Supports NIA's description of geriatric care managers as trained professionals who work with you to form a care plan and find the services you need. General guidance; NIA does not vet individual practitioners or state what they charge.
- Administration for Community Living, Eldercare Locator. Supports the referral route to a local Area Agency on Aging. An Area Agency on Aging does not mediate family disputes, though some fund caregiver counselling that can help.
Removed in this pass, for want of a source we could open: that one sibling provides most or all care in 43% of families, that only 2% split it equally, and that the primary caregiver logs four times the others' hours; and the $100–$200 hourly and $300–$600 assessment rates for care managers, along with the claim that Medicare does not cover them. Corrected: the advice to include the older person "whenever possible" now follows FCA's actual, more careful wording.